The God of This Age
The Teaching
The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. For what we preach is not ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord. For God, who said, ‘Let light shine out of darkness,’ made his light shine in our hearts to give us the light of the knowledge of God’s glory displayed in the face of Jesus Christ. But we have this treasure in jars of clay to show that this all-surpassing power is from God and not from us.
We are hard pressed on every side, but not crushed; perplexed, but not in despair; persecuted, but not abandoned; struck down, but not destroyed.
Commentary
Paul is writing from inside the struggle, not from the comfortable remove of having solved it. He names a force he calls the god of this age: not the ultimate God, but the god of the surface world, of appearances, of the immediately visible. Its method is not dramatic temptation but subtle dimming, the gradual obscuring of a light that was never extinguished, only made harder to see.
The Gnostics, writing in the same era and the same Mediterranean world, used almost identical language for the Demiurge, the lesser ruler of material reality who keeps souls occupied with the surface of things. The Hindu concept of Maya is the same force named in Sanskrit. The Sufi hijab is the same veil in Arabic. The Buddhist moha is the same delusion in Pali. Paul’s ‘god of this age’ is the perennial tradition’s most durable observation: there is something in the structure of ordinary consciousness that systematically obscures the ground of reality. Not through malice. Through gravity. The surface world is simply very convincing.
The answer Paul gives is not a technique. It is a recognition: ‘We have this treasure in jars of clay.’ The light is already inside the ordinary fragile vessel of a human life. It did not need to be added. The spiritual life is not the acquisition of something absent but the clearing away of what has been obscuring what was always present.
This is Eckhart’s subtraction. This is the Tao Te Ching’s daily dropping. This is the Gita’s release of fruits. Every tradition arrives at the same movement, not toward the light, but away from what has been blocking it.
Themes
Connections 9
Travelled
Christianity reached Sufism by 700 CE. Early Muslim ascetics wore wool and learned from Christian monks, and early Sufi literature is full of meetings with them. The extent is argued.
Unsure
Christianity and Hermeticism were in contact, but no influence of Christianity on Hermeticism is documented. Tertullian named ‘Mercurius Trismegistus’ (c. 200–210), Lactantius (c. 300) quoted Hermes Trismegistus as a pagan prophet. Ficino translated the Corpus Hermeticum for the Medici (1463).
Travelled
Christianity reached Gnosticism by 100 CE. The same milieu. Irenaeus wrote against the Gnostics (c. 180); the Gospel of Thomas, whose Gnostic character is itself disputed, shares sayings with the Gospels.
Arose apart
No known transmission between Christianity and Taoism while these teachings took shape. The Church of the East reached Chang’an in 635 and described itself in Taoist and Buddhist terms (Xi’an Stele, 781), long after both took shape.
Arose apart
No known line from Christianity to this scientific work.