The Antibody Network ·The Map

The Self in All Things — Aham Brahmasmi

Tradition Hinduism Source Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 1.4.10 Era c. 700 BCE

The Teaching

In the beginning, this universe was Brahman alone, and it knew only itself, thinking: “I am Brahman.” Therefore it became the All. Whoever among the gods became awakened to this also became that All; the same was true among sages, the same among humans.

Seeing this, the seer Vamadeva understood: “I was Manu and the sun.” And even now whoever knows “I am Brahman” becomes this All.

Now if a person worships another deity thinking “he is one and I am another,” that person does not know. Just as many animals serve a human, so too each person serves the gods when they remain in ignorance of their true nature.

Commentary

Aham Brahmasmi, I am Brahman, is the second of the four Mahavakyas. Where Chandogya’s Tat Tvam Asi is addressed to the student (you are that), Brihadaranyaka’s formulation is the first-person realization: I am Brahman.

The remarkable final lines, that it is not pleasing to the gods that humans should know this, echo the Gnostic insight that institutional powers have an interest in keeping human beings from recognizing their divine nature.

John’s Gospel makes the same point: ‘the world did not recognize him.’ The Logos/Brahman/Tao is everywhere present and everywhere unrecognized by those who have been taught to look everywhere except within.

Themes

Connections 11

Christianity
In the Beginning Was the Word
John 1:1–14
Arose apart

No known transmission between Hinduism and Christianity while these teachings took shape. Christians lived in Kerala from early centuries, but exchange of ideas begins only with the Jesuits: Akbar’s court debates (from 1580), Roberto de Nobili writing on Hindu doctrine in Tamil (from 1606), then Wilkins’s English Gita (1785), the Upanishads in Latin (1801–02) and Vivekananda (1893). All long after either’s formative teachings.

Gnosticism
The Kingdom Within and Without
Gospel of Thomas, Saying 3
Unsure

Hippolytus (c. 225) reports Brahmin doctrine alongside the Gnostic schools he attacks. Indian influence on Gnosticism is argued.

Taoism
The Nameless Beginning
Tao Te Ching, Chapter 1 (Mitchell trans.)
Arose apart

No known transmission between Hinduism and Taoism while these teachings took shape.

Hermeticism
The Vision of Poimandres
Corpus Hermeticum, Book I
Arose apart

No known transmission between Hermeticism and Hinduism while these teachings took shape.

Neoplatonism
The One Beyond All Being
Plotinus, Enneads VI.9
Unsure

Plotinus hoped to learn Indian philosophy (Porphyry, Life 3). Indian influence on him is argued.

Judaism
Ein Sof — The Infinite Without End
Zohar / Lurianic Kabbalah
Arose apart

No known transmission between Hinduism and Judaism while these teachings took shape.

Mysticism
God and the Godhead
Meister Eckhart, Sermons (c. 1300 CE)
Arose apart

No known transmission between Hinduism and Christianity while these teachings took shape. Christians lived in Kerala from early centuries, but exchange of ideas begins only with the Jesuits: Akbar’s court debates (from 1580), Roberto de Nobili writing on Hindu doctrine in Tamil (from 1606), then Wilkins’s English Gita (1785), the Upanishads in Latin (1801–02) and Vivekananda (1893). All long after either’s formative teachings.

Hermeticism
The Principle of Mentalism
The Kybalion (Three Initiates, 1908) / Corpus Hermeticum
Travelled

The Kybalion (1908) is generally attributed to William Walker Atkinson, who also wrote on yoga as ‘Yogi Ramacharaka’.

Gnosticism
The Demiurge and the Hidden God
Apocryphon of John (Nag Hammadi Codex II, 2nd–3rd century CE)
Unsure

Hippolytus (c. 225) reports Brahmin doctrine alongside the Gnostic schools he attacks. Indian influence on Gnosticism is argued.

See this node in the Map